Historical Metrics Dashboard
The Historical Metrics Dashboard shows how your AI visibility changes over time. It displays trends in brand consistency, share of voice, mentions, citations, and gap opportunities, helping you measure the impact of your optimization efforts.
What You'll Learn
In this guide, you'll learn:
- How to interpret each chart on the dashboard
- Why AI metrics naturally fluctuate
- How to identify real improvements versus normal variation
- How to use time range filters effectively
Prerequisites
This dashboard requires data from AI Visibility Reports. Run reports regularly to populate historical data and track trends over time.
Understanding Data Variability
Important: AI output is non-deterministic by nature. Ask an AI assistant the same question twice and you may get different responses. This means your brand might appear in one answer but not the next, even for identical queries.
Because of this uncertainty, charts display data as ranges rather than exact values. The shaded bands around metrics represent typical variability (approximately ±8%). This is normal and expected.
What Counts as Real Change
- Trust trends, not single points: One report showing 45% SOV and the next showing 50% doesn't necessarily mean improvement. But three consecutive reports trending upward likely indicates real progress.
- Look for sustained movement: A metric that stays outside the confidence band for three or more consecutive reports probably represents genuine change.
- Consider context: If metrics improve right after publishing major content, that's likely causal. Random improvements with no changes are probably just variation.
It's not uncommon to see small decreases in reports run close together. The goal is to capture statistically significant improvements over time, not to react to every fluctuation.
Charts Explained
Brand Consistency Over Time
This chart shows your consistency score (0-100) across all AI platforms. Brand consistency measures how reliably your brand appears when AI platforms answer questions in your space.
What to look for:
- Upward trend: Your optimization efforts are working
- Flat trend: You're maintaining position but not improving
- Downward trend: Either you're slipping or competitors are improving faster
- Large jumps: Often indicate new content or authority signals taking effect
The shaded band shows typical variation. Small changes within this band should be interpreted directionally, not as definitive improvements.
Share of Voice & Mentions
This dual-axis chart shows your Share of Voice percentage (left axis) and total mention count (right axis).
Share of Voice is your primary competitive metric. It shows the percentage of AI responses where your brand appears compared to all opportunities.
Mentions provide context for your SOV percentage:
- Rising SOV with flat mentions means you're holding steady while competitors decline
- Flat SOV with rising mentions means everyone's improving together
- Rising both indicates you're genuinely growing visibility
Citations Over Time
Citations indicate how often AI platforms reference your domain as a source. This is a strong signal of authority and trustworthiness.
Citation patterns to understand:
- Steady growth indicates building authority
- Sudden spikes often follow publication of data-rich content
- Citations often preceed mentions (you get cited first, and mentions are drawn from them)
Grounding Search Gap Trends
This chart tracks two metrics:
- Gap count (area): Total searches where competitors rank but you don't
- Average competitor rank (line): How well competitors are positioning
Interpreting gap trends:
- Declining gaps: You're successfully closing visibility opportunities
- Rising gaps: Competitors are finding new ranking opportunities
- Improving competitor ranks: The competitive bar is rising
- Declining competitor ranks: Optimization opportunities competitors haven't found
Using Time Range Filters
The time range selector lets you focus on specific periods:
7 Days
Use for:
- Testing impact of specific content published this week
- Monitoring immediate response to technical changes
- Checking if a competitor suddenly improved
30 Days
Use for:
- Regular monthly performance reviews
- Evaluating recent optimization efforts
- Comparing this month to last month
90 Days
Use for:
- Preparing quarterly business reviews
- Assessing long-term strategy effectiveness
- Identifying seasonal patterns
Custom Range
Use for:
- Comparing before/after a site redesign
- Measuring impact of a content campaign with specific dates
- Analyzing performance during a product launch period
Top Gap Opportunities
Below the charts, you'll find a list of your highest-priority gap opportunities. These are grounding searches where competitors rank but you don't.
For each gap, you'll see:
- The specific search query competitors rank for
- How many discovery queries use this grounding search
- Which competitor ranks best and at what position
Using This List
- Start with gaps used in multiple queries (highest leverage)
- Check if you have content targeting this search
- Review what competitors rank for this search
- Create or optimize content to rank in the top 30
- Re-run your AI Visibility Report to verify improvement
Best Practices
Track After Major Changes
Whenever you publish significant content or make technical changes, note the date. Check Historical Metrics 7-14 days later to see the impact.
Set Quarterly Goals
Based on your current baseline, set realistic quarterly targets:
- 5-10% improvement in Share of Voice
- 10-20% increase in citations
- 20-30% reduction in gap opportunities
AI visibility improves gradually. Expecting month-over-month doubling sets you up for disappointment.
Document Your Efforts
Keep a simple log of optimization work with dates. When metrics improve, you'll know what likely drove the change.
Related
- AI Visibility Reports - Run reports to generate historical data
- AI Visibility Rankings - See detailed ranking data for grounding searches
- Discovery Queries - Manage the queries tested in reports